Freedom of expression must include the license to offend. Debate
Description
As valued as it is, the principle of free speech through which everyone can have their say is an especially slippery slope as populations grow more pluralistic and the desire to get along creates pressure to curtail any expression that may potentially insult some portion of the people. Must freedom of expression include the license to offend? That is the question in this Oxford Union-style debate as panelists make their case. Speakers for the motion bring up the pernicious effects of censorship, the suppression of healthy debate, and repressiveness that can lead to authoritarianism, while those against speak of freedom of speech as a means to an end rooted in a particular place and time rather than as an ideal and stress the value to society of outlawing expression such as child pornography. Questions from the floor follow. The final vote? Significantly for. BBC One O'Clock News presenter Anna Ford presides.
Runtime
109 min
Subjects
- Civil rights (308)
- Social change (532)
- Mass media and culture (147)
- Publishing (86)
- Mass media (887)
- Liberty (131)
- Globalization (272)
- Journalism (185)
- Political sociology (90)
Geography
Genre
Date of Publication
[2009], c2006
Database
Films on Demand
Direct Link
Similar Films
Watch what you say. Free speech in times of national crisis
American experience. 1964. Part 2 of 2
Breaking the Wall to True Press Freedom, How Open Journalism Saves Publishing in the Digital Age
Redneck Revolt
Unseen cinema. Inverted narratives. 4
Martin Luther King, Jr
American experience. 1964. Part 2 of 2
Miles of smiles, years of struggle
Bill Moyers Journal. Robert Bly and Grace Lee Boggs
Sunday morning. Opinion
FRONTLINE. Separated
The Ferry. A Civil Rights Story
National Security and Freedom of the Press
Anatomy of Hate. A Dialogue for Hope
Moyers & Company. John Lewis Marches On