The Equal Protection Clause Forbids Racial Preferences in State University Admissions. A Debate
Description
The equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that "No State shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Yet many state universities give preferences to members of certain races and groups when deciding whom to admit. In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court approved such preferences but only in specific circumstances and under narrow guidelines, and the issue has come before the Court several times since. Defenders of racial preferences argue that they help level the playing field for people from historically disadvantaged groups, remedy prior discrimination, and enhance diversity within the classroom, thus redeeming the true promise of equal protection. But opponents of such preferences argue that they are in themselves discriminatory, that they stigmatize recipients as being less qualified for admission, and that they thus violate the Constitution. Does the equal protection clause forbid racial preferences in state university admissions?
Runtime
1 hr 41 min 43 sec
Subjects
Database
Films on Demand
Direct Link
Similar Films
Majority Minority. The resegregation of public schools
Bearing witness
America to me. Tsunami of privilege. Episode seven
Transforming America. Life in the fast lane. Lesson23
America to me. I don't have to think about being white. Episode five
America to me. There is no pain that compares to the struggle. Episode three
PBS NewsHour
Rise of the Wahine. Champions of Title IX
Bill Gates. How to narrow the gap of inequality
Educating Everybody's Children
Tony Brown's journal. Are college scholarships quotas?
Men Are Finished. A Debate
50 years of Brown vs. Board work at risk. Bollinger
Think like a global citizen. What's the difference between equity and equality?