Supreme Court decisions that changed the nation. U.S. v Nixon
Description
One of the central concepts of the Constitution is the separation of powers among the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government. But two hundred years of American history have shown that the respective powers of the three branches sometimes overlap and conflict. U.S. v. Nixon is an example of just such a conflict. It provoked an assertion by the President that he must have strict confidentiality of his correspondence and other materials in order to operate the office of the Chief Executive effectively. When these materials were used as evidence necessary in a criminal trial, the question presented to the Supreme Court was: Which branch should prevail? U.S. v. Nixon can be used in an American history or government class to demonstrate that the separation of powers is not a static concept, but one that is continually evolving and developing.
Runtime
24 minutes
Series
Subjects
- Separation of powers (2)
- Watergate Affair, 1972-1974 (58)
- Executive privilege (Government information) (3)
- Constitutional law (89)
Contributor
Geography
Genre
Database
Alexander Street
Direct Link
Similar Films
Supreme Court decisions that changed the nation. Gideon vs. Wainwright and Miranda vs. Arizona
Supreme Court decisions that changed the nation. McCulloch vs. Maryland
Amendment 2. Right to bear arms
The Constitution and foundations of government
The constitution. Executive privilege and delegation of powers. [Unit 1]
Think like a global citizen. Why do countries have constitutions?
Henry Steele Commager
Human rights
Amendment 23. D.C. Voting
The Secret Government. A Constitution in Crisis
Citizenship and civic responsibilities
The President Has Exceeded His Constitutional Authority by Waging War without Congressional Authorization. A Debate
Amendment 26. Voting for 18-year-olds
The constitution. Campaign spending. [Unit 7]
Moyers. Report from Philadelphia video clip collection