UW Oshkosh Web Accessibility Guidelines and Resources

A-Prompt Results

Fall 2001

Spring 2001

Our A-Prompt evaluation highlighted errors that were difficult to determine in the other parts of the review. It also confirmed some errors that we had already found.

It was difficult to evaluate a set of pages that were the same across all programs; instead, we reviewed a sample content page from each program. Content pages are the most important aspect of LMS packages, as these are most likely to contain vital course information.
A-Prompt revealed a number of similarities across the products. The same seven errors occurred in each course package. A-Prompt reported missing DOCTYPEs, fixed font sizes, missing descriptive text for images, link text that is not meaningful, missing captions, and missing summaries for tables.

A-Prompt found unique errors in the products as well. Two products, Blackboard 5 and Prometheus, do not identify the language of the page. All products save Blackboard 4 had JavaScript problems. These products provided no alternative to JavaScript-based functions, such as login and chat forums. This issue is reflected in the reader tests we did with these products. A-Prompt found suspicious alt tags and input label problems in WebCT, and auto-refresh errors in Blackboard 5.

 

 

Introduction to the project | Evaluation process | Results by LMS | Results by evaluation process | Concluding remarks, Spring 2001 | Campus web accessibility standards

University of Wisconsin Oshkosh

Content authored by AnnMarie Johnson and Sean Ruppert. ©2001
last updated November 19, 2001 by AnnMarie Johnson.