ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC
CO-OPERATION
Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention
signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th
September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) shall promote
policies designed:
– To achieve the highest sustainable economic
growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries,
while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the
development of the world economy.
– To contribute to sound economic expansion
in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic
development. And
– To contribute to the expansion of world
trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with
international obligations.
The original Member countries of the OECD are
Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland,
Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following
countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated
hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th
June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech
Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd
November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th
December 2000).
7
© OECD 2001
There is a clear trend
in the OECD area towards
a knowledge-based economy…
The ability to create, distribute
and exploit knowledge is increasingly
central to competitive advantage,
wealth creation and better standards of
living. The STI Scoreboard
2001 presents the latest OECD indicators on the
knowledge-based economy. Many are
new, and they are brought together for
the first time in one
publication. As a range of new indicators show, the
knowledge-intensity of OECD
economies is increasing. Investment in
knowledge, particularly in
R&D and software, is rising, as is investment in ICT.
Moreover, the composition of
investment is changing, particularly in R&D
where a growing proportion is
funded by business. Knowledge flows within
and across OECD economies are
increasing as well, as shown by growing
co-operation in science and innovation,
greater international mobility of
high-skilled workers and
continued globalisation of trade and investment.
Information and communications
technologies are also spreading quickly and
support more rapid knowledge
creation and diffusion.
… which is reflected in the
economic and innovative
performance of certain OECD
countries.
The knowledge-based economy is
also reflected in the economic
performance of several OECD
countries. High-technology sectors contribute
to more rapid growth in some, and
the share of these sectors – both in
manufacturing and services –
continues to grow. Moreover, the overall
efficiency of capital and labour
has increased in some OECD countries in the
1990s, partly owing to more rapid
technological progress. Indicators of
patenting confirm the swift pace
of innovation.
Nevertheless, large differences
continue
to mark the move towards
a knowledge-based economy.
While the overall trends are
clear, large differences remain within the
OECD area. The Nordic countries,
notably Finland and Sweden, and the
United States appear to be in the
lead in the transition to a knowledge-based
economy, as high investment in
knowledge, rapid innovation and the pace of
diffusion of ICT indicate.
Countries such as Japan and several large European
countries appear to lag in
important areas, including investment in
knowledge, innovation and growth
of a high-skilled workforce. For certain
OECD countries, openness to
international knowledge flows also seems to
lag. This suggests scope for
further progress. However, the transition to a
knowledge-based economy requires
progress in many areas, and even
countries that are ahead in many
of them lag in others.
New indicators show that the
knowledge-intensity of OECD economies
is increasing
Investment in knowledge
is growing more rapidly than
investment
in fixed capital…
Investment in knowledge, defined
as public and private spending on
higher education, expenditure on
research and development (R&D) and
investment in software, accounts
for about 4.7% of OECD-wide GDP. It would
exceed 10% of GDP if education
expenditure for all levels was included. By
this measure, Sweden, the United
States, Korea and Finland are the four most
knowledge-based economies. During
the 1990s, investment in knowledge
increased by 3.4% annually in the
OECD area, while investment in fixed
capital increased by 2.2%.
OECD, STI Scoreboard 2001
… and ICT has been the most
dynamic element.
ICT hardware and software have
been the most dynamic area for
investment. The available data
show that it rose from less than 15% of total
non-residential investment in the
business sector in the early 1980s to
between 15% and 35% in 1999.
Investment in software accounted for 25-40% of
the contribution of ICT to
overall investment growth.
Investment in education and
skills underpins the growth of
a skilled workforce.
Education and skills, which
underpin the growth of a skilled workforce,
account for the bulk of
investment in knowledge. In 1999, 65% of the
population aged 25-64 in the OECD
area had completed upper secondary
schooling. The share is more than
20 percentage points higher in the United
States and Japan than in the
European Union. In 1999, 14% of the OECD-area
population aged 25-64 had
university-level education.
Human resources in science
and technology are
expanding…
In 1999, there were about 38
million workers (about 25% of the labour
force) in highly skilled
S&T-related occupations in the European Union. The
share was highest – about
one-third – in the Nordic countries (Sweden,
Denmark, Finland) and in the
Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Human
resources in science and
technology (HRST) grew significantly between 1995
and 1999 in southern Europe,
Ireland and Finland. The growth rate of HRST was
similar in European Union
countries and the United States (about 3% annually).
… as is expenditure for R&D.
OECD-area expenditure on R&D
has increased considerably over the
past two decades. It has grown by
almost 4% a year and has accelerated since
the mid-1990s. Most of the
increase between 1994 and 1999 was due to the
United States. During the 1990s,
R&D expenditure grew by more than 13%
annually in Ireland, Mexico and
Iceland. In 1999, OECD countries allocated
about USD 553 billion to R&D,
or approximately 2.2% of overall GDP. Since the
mid-1990s, R&D intensity has
increased continuously in Japan and the United
States and has remained more or
less stable in the European Union.
Innovation relies also on
venture capital.
Despite a recent slowdown,
venture capital remains a major source of
funding for new technology-based
firms. Between 1995 and 1999, it amounted
to 0.21% of GDP in the United
States and 0.16% of GDP in Canada and the
Netherlands for early and
expansion stages. Almost half of venture capital
investment in the OECD area is
for ICT, representing more than 67% in the
United States and over 53% in
Ireland and Norway. Biotechnology is also of
growing importance, accounting
for the bulk of venture capital investments in
Hungary, and about 15% in the
United States.
The role of business in R&D
is increasing
Business is the main source of
increased spending on R&D.
The business sector is the major
source of R&D financing. In 1999, it
provided more than 60% of
domestic R&D funding in OECD countries, a slight
increase from 1990. Over the
decade, the business sector’s share increased
from 57% to 67% of total R&D
funding in the United States; it remained stable
in Japan at around 72% and
increased from 52% to 55% in the European Union.
In most countries, government’s
role in funding R&D declined over the 1990s.
More R&D spending is
directed towards basic
research…
Most countries spent a higher
share of GDP on basic research in 1998-99 than
in the early 1980s. Since 1995,
the ratio of expenditure on basic research to GDP
has been flat in the United
States, but it has grown in Japan, France and Italy.
Relative to GDP, Switzerland
allocates close to 0.8% of GDP to basic research,
almost twice as much as the
United States or Japan. In Korea, Japan and Ireland, around one-third of basic
research is performed by the business sector.
… with less going to defence…
During
the 1990s, the share of defence R&D budgets relative to GDP
dropped in most countries,
largely owing to the overall reduction in military
spending. France, the United
States and Sweden experienced the strongest
decline. Nonetheless, more than
half of the US government R&D budget is
allocated to defence, as is
around a third of the total R&D budget in the
United Kingdom and around a
quarter in France and Spain.
… and more to health…
During the 1990s, government
support for health-related R&D rose
quickly in Japan (10%) and the
United States (8%), with growth rates about
double that in the European Union
(5%). Compared to the European Union
and Japan, government support for
health R&D is high in the United States.
In 2000, it represented about
0.2% of GDP, far above the figures for the
European Union (0.05% in 1998)
and Japan (0.03%). This difference is partly
due to institutional differences.
When appropriate adjustments are made,
however, Finland, Austria and the
Netherlands have health R&D budgets
relative to GDP similar to that
of the United States. The difference in
government support for health
R&D between the United States and the
European Union also narrows
sharply.
… with a growing share
for biotechnology.
A significant and increasing part
of health R&D concerns biotechnology.
Data for biotechnology R&D
are currently only available for 20 OECD
countries and do not include the
United States and Japan. They show that,
in 1997, public funding of biotechnology
R&D amounted to approximately
USD 3.4 billion. Germany (USD 1.0
bi llion), the United Kingdom
(USD 0.7 billion) and France (USD
0.6 billion) account for the bulk of it.
Belgium and Canada have the
highest ratio of biotechnology R&D to total
government budget appropriations
for R&D (14% and 10%, respectively).
R&D in the ICT sector also
contributes significantly
to overall R&D.
ICT also accounts for a growing
share of overall R&D. Data for 19 OECD
countries indicate that, in 1998,
R&D expenditure for ICT manufacturing was
approximately USD 96 billion; for
the ICT services industries, data for
11 OECD countries show
expenditure of USD 18 billion. In 1998, Finland was
the only country to allocate more
than 1% of GDP to ICT-related manufacturing
R&D. ICT-related R&D
intensities of the large European economies are well
below those of the United States
and Japan. In the 1990s, the United Kingdom
is the only large European
country where ICT-related R&D increased slightly
in manufacturing and services industries
(by 1% and 3% a year, respectively).
In manufacturing, ICT-related
R&D decreased in Germany, France and Italy by
1%, 2% and 0.5%, respectively.
Knowledge flows within and across
economies take on greater importance
Innovation increasingly relies
on co-operation between firms
and universities.
The use and generation of
knowledge depend not only on the creation of
knowledge but also on flows of
knowledge within and among economies.
Collaboration between business
and non-business entities is rising, and the
share of R&D performed by the
higher education and government sectors and
funded by the business sector is
increasing. It represented 6.1% and 4.1% of
higher education and government
research, respectively, in 1998. Data from
innovation surveys show that
firms with co-operation arrangements with higher
education or government
institutes account for around 10% of total employment.
International co-operation in
science and innovation
is growing rapidly…
Production of scientific research
and technological know-how also
increasingly depends on research
conducted in other countries. In the mid-
1990s, 27% of scientific
publications in the OECD area were the work of
multinational teams and 7% of
patents were the result of international
co-operative research. In smaller
European countries, such as Belgium,
Denmark and Austria, over 40% of
scientific publications have a foreign
co-author. When intra-EU
co-operation is factored out, researchers in the
United States and the European
Union have a similar propensity to
co-operate with foreign
researchers; in Japan, instead, international
co-operation in science and
technology is quite limited.
… as is cross-border
ownership of inventions.
More and more technology is owned
by firms from a country other than
the inventor’s country of
residence. In the mid-1990s, an average of 14% of all
inventions in any OECD country
were owned or co-owned by a foreign
resident. Likewise, OECD
countries owned around 15% of inventions made
abroad. Foreign ownership of
domestic inventions is high in several small
OECD countries, but also in
Canada and the United Kingdom, where US
companies own a large share of
inventions. Domestic ownership of foreign
inventions is also high in small
countries; 39% of all inventions owned by
Swiss residents were invented
abroad. In the United States, the share of
foreign inventions in the patent
portfolio is only 13%. Japan and Korea are the
least internationalised in this
respect.
Worker mobility supports the
flow of knowledge across
borders…
Knowledge flows also result from
migration. In the United States, for
instance, the largest number of
scientists and engineers (S&Es) with S&E
doctorates who were born
elsewhere in the OECD area are from the United
Kingdom and Canada; relatively
few are from Germany or Japan. However,
three times as many foreign-born
scientists are from China and twice as many
from India as from the United
Kingdom. In 1998, for the 14 European countries
as a whole, non-national HRST
amounted to only 3%. However, European
countries differ widely;
Luxembourg employs by far the largest share of
non-nationals (33%), followed by
Austria, Belgium and the United Kingdom.
… as does student mobility.
International
mobility of students also represents a potential flow of
qualified workers. Five countries
are host to more than 70% of all foreign
students in OECD countries. The
United States attracts 29% of foreign
students, followed by the United
Kingdom (14%) and Germany (12%).
English-speaking countries
account for over 50% of the OECD total. In
Switzerland, Australia, Austria,
Belgium and the United Kingdom, foreign
students represent more than 10%
of total enrolments. In Korea, Mexico and
Poland, they account for less
than 1%.
The globalisation of the
knowledge economy is
apparent in the rapid growth
of international transactions.
National economies also integrate
in other ways. Financial transactions
(e.g. direct investment
and portfolio investment) constitute the fastest growing
segment of international
transactions. The upsurge in direct
investment and portfolio
investment was especially rapid in the second half
of the 1990s. However, such
investment flows have proven highly volatile. The
lowering of trade and non-trade
tariff barriers has also contributed to a steady
rise in international trade.
Trade is growing rapidly,
particularly in services…
The share of trade in
international transactions has remained persistently
high, averaging 15% of OECD GDP
in the 1990s. That of trade in goods is four
times that of trade in services,
despite the acceleration of the latter. In the
second half of the 1990s,
international trade in services as a share of GDP
picked up slightly, partly as the
result of the growing tradability of certain
services, e.g. software,
financial services and accounting. The trade-to-GDP
ratio is only around 10% for the
United States, Japan and the European Union
when intra-EU trade flows are
excluded. During the 1990s, the international
trade-to-GDP ratio grew on
average about 2% in the European Union and the
United States but declined
slightly in Japan.
… and foreign direct
investment has picked
up in recent years...
Flows of foreign direct
investment (FDI) have surged in recent years,
owing to renewed dynamism in the
world economy and a favourable
international investment
environment. FDI flows as a percentage of GDP are
high for Belgium-Luxembourg, New
Zealand, Sweden, the Netherlands,
Switzerland and the United
Kingdom. They remain small in Turkey, Korea,
Japan and Italy. In Germany,
Japan and the United Kingdom, outward
investment greatly exceeds inward
investment, while Australia, Hungary,
Poland and Spain receive more
foreign capital than they invest abroad.
… partly owing to increases in
mergers and acquisitions.
Mergers and acquisitions are the
most common form of FDI. During the
1990s, cross-border mergers and
acquisitions increased more than five-fold
worldwide on a value basis. The
United States was the main target during the
1995-99 period, attracting on
average four times as many deals in terms of
number than the United Kingdom,
the second target country. Germany and
France took third and fourth
place. During the 1990s, the most active sectors
at global level were oil,
automotive equipment, banking, finance and
telecommunications.
Multinational firms also
account for a growing share of
activity in many countries…
The share of turnover under
foreign control in the manufacturing sector
ranges from about 70% in Hungary
and Ireland to under 2% in Japan. In the
period 1995-98, the shares of
foreign affiliates in manufacturing turnover rose
almost everywhere. In terms of
manufacturing employment, their shares range
from around 50% in Ireland,
Luxembourg, and Hungary to 1% in Japan. In the
second half of the 1990s, when
manufacturing employment typically declined
in national firms, it rose in
foreign affiliates in all countries except Germany
and Netherlands. In most cases,
this reflected changes of ownership owing to
buy-outs and acquisitions.
… and increasingly
in the services sector
as well.
The share of turnover under
foreign control in the services sector is over
20% for Hungary, Belgium, Ireland
and Italy. In terms of employment, the
share of foreign affiliates
ranges from 19% in Belgium and around 14% in
Hungary and Ireland to less than
1% in Japan. In all countries except Norway
and Finland, the share of
turnover of foreign affiliates was greater for
manufacturing than for services.
Information and communications
technologies are diffusing rapidly
The knowledge-based economy
is accompanied by the rapid
diffusion of ICT,
especially the Internet.
The diffusion of information and
communications technology is a key
enabler of the knowledge-based
economy. Access to ICT has grown rapidly
over the past years. At the end
of 1999, OECD countries had more than one
network access channel for every
two inhabitants and several countries had
more than one access channel per
inhabitant. The Nordic countries maintain a
clear lead over the rest of the
OECD area when connectivity provided by
wireless networks is taken into
account. Internet technologies are diffusing
very rapidly. At the end of 1999,
there were nearly 50 million Internet
subscribers in the United States,
close to 11 million in Japan and in Korea,
9 million in Germany, 7.4 million
in the United Kingdom and 6.2 million in
Canada. A ranking of countries in
terms of Internet subscribers per
100 population shows high levels
of take-up in Korea, Sweden, Denmark,
Canada, the United States,
Netherlands, Iceland and Norway.
Access to the Internet is
soaring in most countries…
Personal computers are still the
main device used by households to access
the Internet. In most countries
for which data are available, more than half of all
households now have computers. In
2000, there was a noticeable gap between
northern European countries such
as the Netherlands (69%), Denmark (65%) and Sweden (60%) and southern European
countries such as Italy (28%), France (27%) and Turkey (12%). Internet access
in households is soaring everywhere, especially in Italy where the access rate
grew by 144% between 1999 and 2000, as well as in the United Kingdom (75%),
Japan (74%) and France (73%).
… as is its use, but Internet
transactions remain limited.
The share of adults using the
Internet from any location is also increasing
rapidly. More than half of the
adult population now uses the Internet in
Sweden (68%), Denmark (62%),
Finland (54%) and Canada (53%). The Internet
is still mostly used to search
for information, and the propensity to carry out
transactions over the Internet
varies widely. In Sweden, 43% of Internet users
purchase over the Internet,
followed by the United Kingdom (33%), the
United States (30%) and Denmark
(29%). Business use of the Internet is
increasing very rapidly. Internet
penetration in businesses with ten or more
employees has reached 80-90% in
the Nordic countries, Australia, Canada, the
Netherlands and the United
Kingdom. In the Nordic countries, over 40% of
employees use the Internet in
their daily work. The use of the Internet to
conduct transactions, although
rising fast, is limited. The value of Internet
sales in 2000 ranged between 0.4%
and 2% of total sales, while electronic sales
(including those over all
computer-mediated networks) reached almost 6% in
the United Kingdom.
The rate of diffusion differs
between users and across
countries…
Internet penetration in
households is strongly affected by household
income. The difference between
Internet access in households belonging to the
lowest and highest income
quartiles is highest in the United States and lowest in
Denmark. Internet usage rates are
much higher in large than in small enterprises
and vary in different economic
sectors. The most intensive business users are
generally firms in finance and
insurance, business services and wholesale trade.
… partly owing to differences
in access costs.
A key determinant of
cross-country differences in the diffusion of the
Internet and electronic commerce
is access cost. There are large differences
in prices of leased lines, which
provide the infrastructure for business-tobusiness
electronic commerce. The Nordic
countries have the lowest charges,
at about one-fifth the OECD
average. Differences in Internet access cost for
consumers are even more marked.
At peak times, countries which
traditionally have had unmetered
local calls – Australia, Canada, Mexico, New
Zealand, the United States – are
among the least expensive.
The structure of OECD economies
and of trade reflects the increasing role
of knowledge
As knowledge has grown in
importance, so has the share of
knowledge-intensive
industries…
By the end of the 1990s, high-
and medium-high technology
manufacturing accounted for about
9% of total OECD value added. The
share of high- and medium-high
technology industries was largest in
Ireland, where they accounted for
over 16% of value added, and in Korea
(12.6%). Among the G7 countries,
Germany and Japan had the largest shares
of such industries, at 11.7% and
10.7% of total value added, respectively. In
many OECD countries, including
the United States, this sector has grown
rapidly over the 1990s.
… and knowledge-intensive
services.
Knowledge-based “market” services
accounted for 18% of total value added
in the OECD area. Post and
telecommunications, finance and insurance and
business services are typically
the most intensive technology users among
market services. These sectors
accounted for almost 25% of total value added in
Switzerland. Among the G7
countries, the United States and the United Kingdom
had the largest
knowledge-intensive services sector. In Mexico and Greece, this
sector accounted only for about
10% of value added. If knowledge-intensive
“non-market” services (education
and health) are included, knowledge-intensive
services account for about 29% of
total value added in the OECD area.
The changing structure
of OECD economies is also
reflected in business R&D.
Services have a much smaller
share in R&D than in GDP. In 1998, they
accounted for about 17% of total
business sector R&D in the OECD area, an
increase of 2% from 1992.
Countries differ widely, however. In Norway, 48% of
total business R&D is carried
out in the services sector, 37% in Denmark and
31% in the United States.
Although the share of services R&D increased over
the 1990s in Germany, France and
Japan, these countries still have the lowest
share of services R&D (less
than 10%).
The ICT sector has grown very
rapidly in several OECD
countries.
The ICT sector makes a
substantial contribution to the economy. In 1999, ICT
value added represented between
5% and 14% of business sector value added in OECD countries. The importance of
ICT supply has been increasing, not only in countries like Hungary, the Czech
Republic and Mexico, which are catching up in terms of infrastructure, but also
in Finland, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. In Finland,
the ICT sector’s share of value added increased by 4.7 percentage points over
the 1995-99 period. It now represents over 13% of total business sector value
added. The ICT sector is a major source of employment growth. OECD employment
in the sector grew by over 12% in the
1995-99 period, i.e. an
average annual rate of over 3% a year, double that of overall business sector
employment. ICT services are driving this growth.
International trade
in high-technology goods
is also rising rapidly…
The growing importance of
knowledge-intensive industries is also visible
in the structure of OECD
manufacturing trade. The share of high-technology
industries in total OECD trade
increased from 18% in 1990 to one-quarter
in 1999. The highest growth rates
in OECD manufacturing trade in the 1990s
were in high-technology
industries: pharmaceuticals, radio, television and
communication equipment and
computers. The shares of medium-low- and
low-technology industries have
gradually declined.
… although only a few OECD
countries have a strong
comparative advantage in
high-technology industries.
In spite of the growing
importance of high-technology industries in overall
trade, few OECD countries
specialise in high- and medium-high-technology
industries. In 1999, the
structural surplus in these industries represented more
than 15% of total manufacturing
trade for Japan, about 7.5% for Switzerland and
around 5% for Germany, Mexico and
the United States. A considerable number of OECD countries still have a strong
comparative advantage in medium-low technology and low-technology industries.
The structural surplus of Turkey, New
Zealand and Iceland in these
industries accounted for more than 20% of total
manufacturing trade. For most
OECD countries, these specialisation patterns
have changed little over the past
decade.
Knowledge and innovation
increasingly underpin economic performance
Innovation is a key driver
of economic growth…
Recent patterns show that
knowledge and innovation make a large
contribution to growth. A high
share of investment in fixed capital goes for ICT.
Moreover, the overall efficiency
of the use of capital and labour in the
production process, or
multi-factor productivity (MFP), increased rapidly in
Ireland, Finland, Australia,
Canada and the United States in the second half of
the 1990s. More rapid MFP growth
points to faster technological progress.
Furthermore, rapid productivity
growth in high-technology sectors such as ICT
has contributed strongly to
growth in several countries.
… and patenting is
accelerating, although
differences among OECD
countries are large.
Indicators of patenting confirm
the brisk pace of technological progress.
Over the 1990-97 period, patent
applications at the European Patent Office
increased annually by 5.7% for
the European Union, 4.8% for the United States
and 1.1% for Japan. During the
1990s, growth rates for patents in ICT (8%) and
biotechnology (10%) for the OECD
area were almost twice that of total patent
applications (5%). Indicators of
patent families – patents taken at the European
Patent Office, the US Patent and
Trademark Office and the Japanese Patent
Office to protect a single
invention – show that there were about 32 000 patent
families in the OECD area in
1995. The United States accounted for about 35%,
followed by the European Union
(32%) and Japan (27%). When population size
is taken into account,
Switzerland patents the most by far in the OECD area. In
1995, there were close to 100
patent families per million population in
Switzerland, far above Sweden
(74) and Japan (69).