What if Thurmond had won in 1948?

On the Thurmondification of American politics

Note: This essay also appears on the CommonDreams.org website

by Tony Palmeri

December 15, 2002

Senator Trent Lott is under fire for suggesting, at a birthday bash for his mentor Strom Thurmond, that America would have been better off had Thurmond's 1948 Dixiecrat campaign for the presidency been victorious. Lott's comments have been met with the typical round of sanctimonious and self-righteous posturing from establishment pundits and hypocritical politicians--Democrat and Republican--expressing dismay at the Senator's insensitivity and shock at how anyone today could find anything appealing about Thurmond's segregationist campaign of 1948.

The sanctimonious posturing got me to thinking: what if Thurmond had won in 1948? What kinds of policies might have been followed by the federal government since that time? Maybe the following?:

So to Trent Lott, sanctimonious pundits, and hypocritical politicians: what exactly is it that Strom Thurmond would have done in 1948 that did not actually happen in America since then? The evidence presented above suggests to me that we have surely had a Thurmondification of politics since 1948. Yes, we have had a Lott of that, aided and abetted every step of the way by some of the Senator's most vocal critics.

Tony Palmeri welcomes your feedback

Return to Commentary