Dimmers
The means to controling intensity of instruments. Switches: simple, but abrupt. Some sort of dimmer preferable. Dimmer types: archaic --Salt water dimmers --Resistance dimmer: first really practical portable dimmer Very heavy and large, both DC and AC Needed resistance 5 times load to dim out Turned excess current to heat Piano boards Transformers: 1000 turns : 500 turns 200 volts : 100 volts but Power remains constant, so: 50 Amps @ 200 v. = 100 Amps @ 100 v. Autotransformer: used magnetic impedance rather than resistance, AC only Primary & secondary combined in transformer coil Heavy and large, but didn't waste current as heat Magnetic amplifier: used saturable core principle First commercial remotely controllable dimmer Very heavy & large, not very lineal dimmer curve, expensive but durable Thyrotron tube: first electronic dimmer: Large vaccum tube, remote controllable Cheaper than mag-amps, but required more maintainance Tubes burned out and had to be replaced Solid State dimmers: Short intro to electronics: Semi-conductors: PN junction Diodes: 2 layer device Transistors: 3 layer devices Silicon control rectifiers: 4 layer devices Triacs: 5 layer devices Silicon Control Rectifiers: solid state thyrotron tubes Used in reverse pairs. --Smaller than more dependable than thyrotrons --Remote controlable --Independant of load (mostly) --Electronically noisy: the voltage spike and need for chokes (inductance coils). Triacs: bipolar version of SCR, only one needed for controlling AC Much less robust and hard to make in larger sizes. SSR's or Power cubes: Solid State Relays Depend on high speed timing circuit for control. Like SCR, controls when in sine wave current turns ON. Also requires use of a choke. IGBT Dimmers (Integrated Gate Bipolar Transistors) Primarily being built and promoted by Rosco Technologies. --Does NOT require a choke. --Has no electronic noise, less electronic interferrence. --Rosco claims it needs no cooling fan. --More dependant on integrated microprocessor control. Competitors claim it is more delicate and still unproven.©2000, Mick Alderson
| top of page |
This page maintained by:
Mick Alderson alderson@uwosh.edu Last modified: Sept. 29, 2002 |
| UW Oshkosh Home |