Using the INTASC Teaching Standards for Evaluation of Peer Teaching in an Elementary Music Methods Course

 

Hilree J. Hamilton, Ph.D.

University of Wisconsin-River Falls

hilree.hamilton@uwrf.edu

 

 

Thirty-five states employ the Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC) Teaching Standards.  INTASC collaborates with state teacher licensing boards using a standards-based approach for training and assessing the skills of pre-service teachers.  Students in my music education methods classes complained that what they learned in their education classes wasnít relevant for music educators.  Explanations that the INTASC teaching standards were the centerpiece in assessing skills, knowledge and attitudes being developed in techniques courses and would be used as a determination from the College of Education as to readiness for teaching licensure, resulted in more than one pair of eyes rolling to the ceiling. 

 

I began to incorporate work with the standards in the methods class so that music education students could gain practical experience in applying them to their teaching. The goal was to help build context for how each standard is demonstrated in music teaching and learning.  Shulman (2000) used case studies to help veteran and novice teachers examine how the INTASC standards applied to dilemmas and practices in the realities of classroom experience.  Alban, Proffitt, and SySantos (1998) matched intern and mentor teachers developing a standards-based checklist that they used with portfolios for evaluating pre-service teachersí performance.  These studies show ways for students to apply the INTASC Standards to a developing understanding of teaching.

 

The means that I sought for infusing a richer experience with the standards came from two education professors at my university, Dr. Teri Crotty and Dr. Debra Allyn.  They developed a ìReflective Practitioner Feedback Formî in which the INTASC Standards along with Bloomís Taxonomy created a rubric for rating the reflection papers of their students.  (See rubric.)

 

The form served two purposes for music education students.  First, students experienced the form in some of their other education courses and using it in my class added consistency between education and music education courses.  Second, the form gave opportunities to use both INTASC Standards and Bloomís Taxonomy to evaluate the music lessons students developed and taught.

 

 

Hilree J. Hamilton, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor of Music Education

University of Wisconsin-River Falls

hilree.hamilton@uwrf.edu