Department of Chemistry Assessment Plan 

Seminar Evaluation Forms

download Word version of seminar paper form
download Word version of seminar talk form


Written Scientific Report (Seminar)        Student ________________________________

Evaluation of written report
_____    organization (N no clear organization; I followed an outline; A very logical presentation)
_____    grammar/spelling (N many errors; I few errors; A no errors)
_____    quality of figures (N hand drawn, poor photocopies; I photocopies related to the topic; A clear figures that support the writing)
_____    depth of coverage (N “everybody knows that”; I information not familiar to most undergraduates; A information not familiar to many professors)
_____    scientific accuracy (N several errors that undergraduates should not make; I only errors that professors should not make; A no significant errors)
_____    length (N under 20 pgs; I over 20 pgs)
_____    nomenclature (N incorrect; I correct on standard usage; A correct on uncommon usage)
_____    mathematical representations (N avoids using or uses incorrectly; I uses some; A uses correctly when helpful)
_____    references (N no primary or recent sources; I some primary and some recent sources; A mostly primary and recent sources)


32-490  Chemistry Seminar                EVALUATION FORM

Speaker ________________________________    Reviewer ____________________________

I.  Please rate the seminar speaker on each of the following items using the scale:
       5                  4              3                 2               1                                     NA
Advanced                  Intermediate                   Novice                                   not
(Superior)              (Average Major)         (Average 1st year Student)           applicable

Rating
_____    Organization
_____    Delivery (N volume problems, speed problems, grammatical errors, extra words [um, uh], read from visual aids;  I fewer problems; A almost no problems)
_____    Quality of figures
_____    Depth of coverage (N “everybody knows that”; I information not familiar to most
                    undergraduates; A information not familiar to many professors)
_____    Scientific accuracy  (N several errors that undergraduates should not make; I only errors that professors should not make; A no significant errors)
_____    Length (N under 30 min; I over 30 min)
_____    Ability to answer questions (N uncomfortable, can’t understand questions or give more information than was in the seminar;
                    I can answer some questions, not upset if can’t answer; A can answer questions or give leads to find information)
_____    Use of nomenclature
_____    Use of mathematical representations
_____    Literature references (N no primary or recent sources; I some primary and some recent sources;  A mostly primary and recent sources)

II.  Comments __________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

III.  Based on the above ratings and comments, I recommend that the student speaker be awarded the following letter grade: ______.



back to Assessment Tools

to Chemistry home page

last updated May 25, 2007